Qwen Plus vs Claude 4 Haiku
Performance benchmarks + pricing comparison — updated April 2026
Qwen Plus
QwenBalanced Qwen model for general tasks. Good price-performance ratio.
| Input | $0.400/M |
| Output | $1.20/M |
| Context | 128K tokens |
| Best For | General-purpose tasks, bilingual coding |
| Benchmark | 55/100 |
Claude 4 Haiku
AnthropicUpdated Haiku model with improved reasoning over Claude 3.5 Haiku. Fast and affordable for high-volume tasks.
| Input | $0.800/M |
| Output | $4.00/M |
| Context | 200K tokens |
| Best For | High-volume tasks, simple queries, cost-sensitive workflows |
| Benchmark | 55/100 |
Benchmark Performance Comparison
Third-party benchmark scores — higher is better. Data sourced from SWE-bench, LiveCodeBench, HumanEval, and BigCodeBench.
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Claude 4 Haiku | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 55 | 55 | Qwen Plus leads by 0pts |
| SWE-bench Verified | 48 | 48 | Qwen Plus leads by 0pts |
| LiveCodeBench | 58 | 58 | Qwen Plus leads by 0pts |
| HumanEval | 78 | 78 | Qwen Plus leads by 0pts |
| BigCodeBench | 40 | 40 | Qwen Plus leads by 0pts |
Cost Comparison by Scenario
Estimated cost per project with 30% cache hit rate. Actual costs may vary based on usage patterns.
| Scenario | Qwen Plus | Claude 4 Haiku | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small Script (1K lines) | $0.05 | $0.16 | Qwen Plus saves $0.11 (70%) |
| Medium Feature (10K lines) | $0.38 | $1.24 | Qwen Plus saves $0.86 (69%) |
| Large Project (50K lines) | $1.90 | $6.21 | Qwen Plus saves $4.31 (69%) |
| Code Review (5K lines) | $0.10 | $0.32 | Qwen Plus saves $0.22 (69%) |
Value Analysis (Price per Benchmark Score Point)
Lower is better — how much you pay for each point of benchmark performance.
| Model | Overall Score | Price per Score Point | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen Plus | 55 | $0.007/pt | Better value |
| Claude 4 Haiku | 55 | $0.015/pt | Higher cost per point |
Qwen Plus delivers the best value at $0.007 per score point.
Strengths & Weaknesses
Qwen Plus
- + Budget-friendly
- - Average performance
Claude 4 Haiku
- + Fast
- + Good value
- + Improved over 3.5 Haiku
- - Limited reasoning depth
Verdict
Qwen Plus wins on both price and performance — $0.400/M input with a benchmark score of 55/100.
For most developers, this is the clear choice between these two models.
Compare with Other Models
Claude Sonnet 4
AnthropicAnthropic's balanced model for coding and general tasks. Best price-performance ratio in the Claude family.
Claude Opus 4
AnthropicAnthropic's most powerful model. Best for complex reasoning and challenging coding tasks.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
AnthropicPrevious generation Sonnet. Still excellent for coding tasks at the same price point.
Claude 3.5 Haiku
AnthropicFast, cost-effective model for high-volume tasks. Great for code review and simple queries.
Claude 3 Opus
AnthropicFirst generation Opus. Highest reasoning capability in the Claude 3 family.
Claude 3 Sonnet
AnthropicFirst generation Sonnet. Balanced performance for general tasks.