OpenAI o3 vs Qwen Turbo

Performance benchmarks + pricing comparison — updated April 2026

OpenAI o3

OpenAI

Next generation reasoning model. Improved coding and math over o1.

Input$10.00/M
Output$40.00/M
Context200K tokens
Best ForAdvanced coding, complex problem-solving
Benchmark85/100

Qwen Turbo

Qwen

Fastest and cheapest Qwen model. Good for high-volume tasks.

Input$0.080/M
Output$0.240/M
Context1M tokens
Best ForHigh-volume tasks, simple coding
Benchmark42/100

Benchmark Performance Comparison

Third-party benchmark scores — higher is better. Data sourced from SWE-bench, LiveCodeBench, HumanEval, and BigCodeBench.

BenchmarkOpenAI o3Qwen TurboLeader
Overall Score 85 42 o3 leads by 43pts
SWE-bench Verified 82 35 o3 leads by 47pts
LiveCodeBench 88 44 o3 leads by 44pts
HumanEval 96 65 o3 leads by 31pts
BigCodeBench 74 28 o3 leads by 46pts

Cost Comparison by Scenario

Estimated cost per project with 30% cache hit rate. Actual costs may vary based on usage patterns.

ScenarioOpenAI o3Qwen TurboSavings
Small Script (1K lines) $1.55 $0.01 Qwen Turbo saves $1.54 (99%)
Medium Feature (10K lines) $11.50 $0.08 Qwen Turbo saves $11.42 (99%)
Large Project (50K lines) $57.50 $0.38 Qwen Turbo saves $57.12 (99%)
Code Review (5K lines) $2.75 $0.02 Qwen Turbo saves $2.73 (99%)

Value Analysis (Price per Benchmark Score Point)

Lower is better — how much you pay for each point of benchmark performance.

ModelOverall ScorePrice per Score PointVerdict
OpenAI o3 85 $0.167/pt Higher cost per point
Qwen Turbo 42 $0.002/pt Better value

Qwen Turbo delivers the best value at $0.002 per score point.

Strengths & Weaknesses

OpenAI o3

  • + Latest reasoning model
  • + Top-tier across all benchmarks
  • - Very expensive
  • - Slow

Qwen Turbo

  • + Cheapest option
  • + Fast
  • - Basic coding only

Verdict

Qwen Turbo is cheaper at $0.080/M, but OpenAI o3 scores higher on benchmarks (85 vs 42).

Choose Qwen Turbo for cost-sensitive projects, OpenAI o3 when performance matters most.

Compare with Other Models