OpenAI o3-mini vs Qwen Max
Performance benchmarks + pricing comparison — updated April 2026
OpenAI o3-mini
OpenAIAffordable reasoning model for coding tasks. Best price-performance for algorithm-heavy work.
| Input | $1.10/M |
| Output | $4.40/M |
| Context | 200K tokens |
| Best For | Algorithm design, coding challenges, debugging |
| Benchmark | 80/100 |
Qwen Max
QwenQwen's most powerful model. Strong reasoning and coding capabilities.
| Input | $1.60/M |
| Output | $6.40/M |
| Context | 32K tokens |
| Best For | Complex reasoning, advanced coding |
| Benchmark | 68/100 |
Benchmark Performance Comparison
Third-party benchmark scores — higher is better. Data sourced from SWE-bench, LiveCodeBench, HumanEval, and BigCodeBench.
| Benchmark | OpenAI o3-mini | Qwen Max | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 80 | 68 | o3-mini leads by 12pts |
| SWE-bench Verified | 76 | 62 | o3-mini leads by 14pts |
| LiveCodeBench | 85 | 70 | o3-mini leads by 15pts |
| HumanEval | 94 | 86 | o3-mini leads by 8pts |
| BigCodeBench | 65 | 54 | o3-mini leads by 11pts |
Cost Comparison by Scenario
Estimated cost per project with 30% cache hit rate. Actual costs may vary based on usage patterns.
| Scenario | OpenAI o3-mini | Qwen Max | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small Script (1K lines) | $0.17 | $0.25 | OpenAI o3-mini saves $0.08 (31%) |
| Medium Feature (10K lines) | $1.27 | $1.84 | OpenAI o3-mini saves $0.58 (31%) |
| Large Project (50K lines) | $6.33 | $9.20 | OpenAI o3-mini saves $2.88 (31%) |
| Code Review (5K lines) | $0.30 | $0.44 | OpenAI o3-mini saves $0.14 (31%) |
Value Analysis (Price per Benchmark Score Point)
Lower is better — how much you pay for each point of benchmark performance.
| Model | Overall Score | Price per Score Point | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpenAI o3-mini | 80 | $0.014/pt | Better value |
| Qwen Max | 68 | $0.024/pt | Higher cost per point |
OpenAI o3-mini delivers the best value at $0.014 per score point.
Strengths & Weaknesses
OpenAI o3-mini
- + Excellent at competitive programming
- + Strong algorithmic reasoning
- - Optimized for reasoning, not chat
Qwen Max
- + Strong Chinese language support
- + Good value
- - Less tested on English coding
Verdict
OpenAI o3-mini wins on both price and performance — $1.10/M input with a benchmark score of 80/100.
For most developers, this is the clear choice between these two models.
Compare with Other Models
Claude Sonnet 4
AnthropicAnthropic's balanced model for coding and general tasks. Best price-performance ratio in the Claude family.
Claude Opus 4
AnthropicAnthropic's most powerful model. Best for complex reasoning and challenging coding tasks.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
AnthropicPrevious generation Sonnet. Still excellent for coding tasks at the same price point.
Claude 3.5 Haiku
AnthropicFast, cost-effective model for high-volume tasks. Great for code review and simple queries.
Claude 3 Opus
AnthropicFirst generation Opus. Highest reasoning capability in the Claude 3 family.
Claude 3 Sonnet
AnthropicFirst generation Sonnet. Balanced performance for general tasks.