Grok 3 vs Microsoft Phi-4
Performance benchmarks + pricing comparison — updated April 2026
Grok 3
xAIxAI's flagship model. Strong general-purpose capability with real-time knowledge access through X platform integration.
| Input | $3.00/M |
| Output | $15.00/M |
| Context | 128K tokens |
| Best For | General coding, research tasks, current-event-aware applications |
| Benchmark | 70/100 |
Microsoft Phi-4
MicrosoftMicrosoft's compact 14B model with strong reasoning and coding capability. Excellent value for small-scale deployments.
| Input | $0.100/M |
| Output | $0.300/M |
| Context | 128K tokens |
| Best For | Edge deployments, local inference, budget coding |
| Benchmark | 45/100 |
Benchmark Performance Comparison
Third-party benchmark scores — higher is better. Data sourced from SWE-bench, LiveCodeBench, HumanEval, and BigCodeBench.
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Microsoft Phi-4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 70 | 45 | Grok 3 leads by 25pts |
| SWE-bench Verified | 64 | 38 | Grok 3 leads by 26pts |
| LiveCodeBench | 72 | 46 | Grok 3 leads by 26pts |
| HumanEval | 88 | 68 | Grok 3 leads by 20pts |
| BigCodeBench | 56 | 30 | Grok 3 leads by 26pts |
Cost Comparison by Scenario
Estimated cost per project with 30% cache hit rate. Actual costs may vary based on usage patterns.
| Scenario | Grok 3 | Microsoft Phi-4 | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small Script (1K lines) | $0.55 | $0.01 | Microsoft Phi-4 saves $0.54 (98%) |
| Medium Feature (10K lines) | $4.05 | $0.10 | Microsoft Phi-4 saves $3.95 (98%) |
| Large Project (50K lines) | $20.25 | $0.47 | Microsoft Phi-4 saves $19.77 (98%) |
| Code Review (5K lines) | $0.90 | $0.02 | Microsoft Phi-4 saves $0.87 (97%) |
Value Analysis (Price per Benchmark Score Point)
Lower is better — how much you pay for each point of benchmark performance.
| Model | Overall Score | Price per Score Point | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grok 3 | 70 | $0.043/pt | Higher cost per point |
| Microsoft Phi-4 | 45 | $0.002/pt | Better value |
Microsoft Phi-4 delivers the best value at $0.002 per score point.
Strengths & Weaknesses
Grok 3
- + Strong reasoning
- + X integration
- - Newer model
- - Limited ecosystem
Microsoft Phi-4
- + Small model, runs locally
- - Limited capacity
Verdict
Microsoft Phi-4 is cheaper at $0.100/M, but Grok 3 scores higher on benchmarks (70 vs 45).
Choose Microsoft Phi-4 for cost-sensitive projects, Grok 3 when performance matters most.
Compare with Other Models
Claude Sonnet 4
AnthropicAnthropic's balanced model for coding and general tasks. Best price-performance ratio in the Claude family.
Claude Opus 4
AnthropicAnthropic's most powerful model. Best for complex reasoning and challenging coding tasks.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
AnthropicPrevious generation Sonnet. Still excellent for coding tasks at the same price point.
Claude 3.5 Haiku
AnthropicFast, cost-effective model for high-volume tasks. Great for code review and simple queries.
Claude 3 Opus
AnthropicFirst generation Opus. Highest reasoning capability in the Claude 3 family.
Claude 3 Sonnet
AnthropicFirst generation Sonnet. Balanced performance for general tasks.