DeepSeek Reasoner (R1) vs Amazon Nova Micro
Performance benchmarks + pricing comparison — updated April 2026
DeepSeek Reasoner (R1)
DeepSeekDeepSeek's reasoning model. Comparable to OpenAI's o1 but at much lower cost.
| Input | $0.550/M |
| Output | $2.19/M |
| Context | 128K tokens |
| Best For | Complex reasoning, math, advanced coding |
| Benchmark | 72/100 |
Amazon Nova Micro
AmazonAmazon's most cost-effective model. Optimized for speed and low-cost text generation tasks.
| Input | $0.035/M |
| Output | $0.140/M |
| Context | 128K tokens |
| Best For | High-volume text processing, summarization |
Cost Comparison by Scenario
Estimated cost per project with 30% cache hit rate. Actual costs may vary based on usage patterns.
| Scenario | DeepSeek Reasoner (R1) | Amazon Nova Micro | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small Script (1K lines) | $0.08 | <$0.01 | Amazon Nova Micro saves $0.08 (94%) |
| Medium Feature (10K lines) | $0.63 | $0.04 | Amazon Nova Micro saves $0.59 (94%) |
| Large Project (50K lines) | $3.15 | $0.20 | Amazon Nova Micro saves $2.95 (94%) |
| Code Review (5K lines) | $0.15 | <$0.01 | Amazon Nova Micro saves $0.14 (94%) |
Verdict
Amazon Nova Micro wins on both price and performance — $0.035/M input with a benchmark score of N/A/100.
For most developers, this is the clear choice between these two models.
Compare with Other Models
Claude Sonnet 4
AnthropicAnthropic's balanced model for coding and general tasks. Best price-performance ratio in the Claude family.
Claude Opus 4
AnthropicAnthropic's most powerful model. Best for complex reasoning and challenging coding tasks.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
AnthropicPrevious generation Sonnet. Still excellent for coding tasks at the same price point.
Claude 3.5 Haiku
AnthropicFast, cost-effective model for high-volume tasks. Great for code review and simple queries.
Claude 3 Opus
AnthropicFirst generation Opus. Highest reasoning capability in the Claude 3 family.
Claude 3 Sonnet
AnthropicFirst generation Sonnet. Balanced performance for general tasks.