Claude Sonnet 4 vs Perplexity Sonar Reasoning Pro

Performance benchmarks + pricing comparison — updated April 2026

Claude Sonnet 4

Anthropic

Anthropic's balanced model for coding and general tasks. Best price-performance ratio in the Claude family.

Input$3.00/M
Output$15.00/M
Context200K tokens
Best ForDay-to-day coding, code review, documentation
Benchmark78/100

Perplexity Sonar Reasoning Pro

Perplexity

Perplexity's most advanced search model with deep reasoning. Complex research tasks with cited sources.

Input$5.00/M
Output$20.00/M
Context128K tokens
Best ForDeep research, academic analysis, complex investigations

Cost Comparison by Scenario

Estimated cost per project with 30% cache hit rate. Actual costs may vary based on usage patterns.

ScenarioClaude Sonnet 4Perplexity Sonar Reasoning ProSavings
Small Script (1K lines) $0.62 $0.78 Claude Sonnet 4 saves $0.16 (21%)
Medium Feature (10K lines) $4.66 $5.75 Claude Sonnet 4 saves $1.09 (19%)
Large Project (50K lines) $23.29 $28.75 Claude Sonnet 4 saves $5.46 (19%)
Code Review (5K lines) $1.20 $1.38 Claude Sonnet 4 saves $0.17 (12%)

Verdict

Claude Sonnet 4 wins on both price and performance — $3.00/M input with a benchmark score of N/A/100.

For most developers, this is the clear choice between these two models.

Compare with Other Models