Claude Sonnet 4 vs GPT-3.5 Turbo
Performance benchmarks + pricing comparison — updated April 2026
Claude Sonnet 4
AnthropicAnthropic's balanced model for coding and general tasks. Best price-performance ratio in the Claude family.
| Input | $3.00/M |
| Output | $15.00/M |
| Context | 200K tokens |
| Best For | Day-to-day coding, code review, documentation |
| Benchmark | 78/100 |
GPT-3.5 Turbo
OpenAIBudget model for simple tasks. Being phased out but still widely used.
| Input | $0.500/M |
| Output | $1.50/M |
| Context | 16K tokens |
| Best For | Simple chatbots, basic text generation |
| Benchmark | 40/100 |
Benchmark Performance Comparison
Third-party benchmark scores — higher is better. Data sourced from SWE-bench, LiveCodeBench, HumanEval, and BigCodeBench.
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4 | GPT-3.5 Turbo | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Score | 78 | 40 | Claude Sonnet 4 leads by 38pts |
| SWE-bench Verified | 74 | 32 | Claude Sonnet 4 leads by 42pts |
| LiveCodeBench | 82 | 42 | Claude Sonnet 4 leads by 40pts |
| HumanEval | 92 | 62 | Claude Sonnet 4 leads by 30pts |
| BigCodeBench | 64 | 26 | Claude Sonnet 4 leads by 38pts |
Cost Comparison by Scenario
Estimated cost per project with 30% cache hit rate. Actual costs may vary based on usage patterns.
| Scenario | Claude Sonnet 4 | GPT-3.5 Turbo | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small Script (1K lines) | $0.62 | $0.06 | GPT-3.5 Turbo saves $0.55 (90%) |
| Medium Feature (10K lines) | $4.66 | $0.48 | GPT-3.5 Turbo saves $4.18 (90%) |
| Large Project (50K lines) | $23.29 | $2.38 | GPT-3.5 Turbo saves $20.91 (90%) |
| Code Review (5K lines) | $1.20 | $0.13 | GPT-3.5 Turbo saves $1.08 (90%) |
Value Analysis (Price per Benchmark Score Point)
Lower is better — how much you pay for each point of benchmark performance.
| Model | Overall Score | Price per Score Point | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 4 | 78 | $0.038/pt | Higher cost per point |
| GPT-3.5 Turbo | 40 | $0.013/pt | Better value |
GPT-3.5 Turbo delivers the best value at $0.013 per score point.
Strengths & Weaknesses
Claude Sonnet 4
- + Price-performance leader
- + Strong at web development
- + Excellent code review
- - Struggles with complex algorithms
- - Less consistent on system design
GPT-3.5 Turbo
- + Ultra-cheap
- + Very fast
- - Basic coding only
Verdict
GPT-3.5 Turbo is cheaper at $0.500/M, but Claude Sonnet 4 scores higher on benchmarks (78 vs 40).
Choose GPT-3.5 Turbo for cost-sensitive projects, Claude Sonnet 4 when performance matters most.
Compare with Other Models
Claude Opus 4
AnthropicAnthropic's most powerful model. Best for complex reasoning and challenging coding tasks.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
AnthropicPrevious generation Sonnet. Still excellent for coding tasks at the same price point.
Claude 3.5 Haiku
AnthropicFast, cost-effective model for high-volume tasks. Great for code review and simple queries.
Claude 3 Opus
AnthropicFirst generation Opus. Highest reasoning capability in the Claude 3 family.
Claude 3 Sonnet
AnthropicFirst generation Sonnet. Balanced performance for general tasks.
Claude 3 Haiku
AnthropicCheapest Claude model. Fast responses for simple tasks and basic coding.