Claude Opus 4 vs Together Llama 3.3 70B

Performance benchmarks + pricing comparison — updated April 2026

Claude Opus 4

Anthropic

Anthropic's most powerful model. Best for complex reasoning and challenging coding tasks.

Input$15.00/M
Output$75.00/M
Context200K tokens
Best ForComplex architecture decisions, debugging hard bugs, research
Benchmark86/100

Together Llama 3.3 70B

Together AI

Llama 3.3 70B via Together AI. Cost-effective inference for open models.

Input$0.880/M
Output$0.880/M
Context128K tokens
Best ForCost-effective general AI, open-source preference

Cost Comparison by Scenario

Estimated cost per project with 30% cache hit rate. Actual costs may vary based on usage patterns.

ScenarioClaude Opus 4Together Llama 3.3 70BSavings
Small Script (1K lines) $3.08 $0.06 Together Llama 3.3 70B saves $3.02 (98%)
Medium Feature (10K lines) $23.29 $0.48 Together Llama 3.3 70B saves $22.80 (98%)
Large Project (50K lines) $116.44 $2.42 Together Llama 3.3 70B saves $114.02 (98%)
Code Review (5K lines) $6.02 $0.18 Together Llama 3.3 70B saves $5.84 (97%)

Verdict

Together Llama 3.3 70B wins on both price and performance — $0.880/M input with a benchmark score of N/A/100.

For most developers, this is the clear choice between these two models.

Compare with Other Models