Claude Opus 4 vs Perplexity Sonar Reasoning Pro

Performance benchmarks + pricing comparison — updated April 2026

Claude Opus 4

Anthropic

Anthropic's most powerful model. Best for complex reasoning and challenging coding tasks.

Input$15.00/M
Output$75.00/M
Context200K tokens
Best ForComplex architecture decisions, debugging hard bugs, research
Benchmark86/100

Perplexity Sonar Reasoning Pro

Perplexity

Perplexity's most advanced search model with deep reasoning. Complex research tasks with cited sources.

Input$5.00/M
Output$20.00/M
Context128K tokens
Best ForDeep research, academic analysis, complex investigations

Cost Comparison by Scenario

Estimated cost per project with 30% cache hit rate. Actual costs may vary based on usage patterns.

ScenarioClaude Opus 4Perplexity Sonar Reasoning ProSavings
Small Script (1K lines) $3.08 $0.78 Perplexity Sonar Reasoning Pro saves $2.30 (75%)
Medium Feature (10K lines) $23.29 $5.75 Perplexity Sonar Reasoning Pro saves $17.54 (75%)
Large Project (50K lines) $116.44 $28.75 Perplexity Sonar Reasoning Pro saves $87.69 (75%)
Code Review (5K lines) $6.02 $1.38 Perplexity Sonar Reasoning Pro saves $4.64 (77%)

Verdict

Perplexity Sonar Reasoning Pro wins on both price and performance — $5.00/M input with a benchmark score of N/A/100.

For most developers, this is the clear choice between these two models.

Compare with Other Models