Claude Opus 4 vs Perplexity Sonar Pro

Performance benchmarks + pricing comparison — updated April 2026

Claude Opus 4

Anthropic

Anthropic's most powerful model. Best for complex reasoning and challenging coding tasks.

Input$15.00/M
Output$75.00/M
Context200K tokens
Best ForComplex architecture decisions, debugging hard bugs, research
Benchmark86/100

Perplexity Sonar Pro

Perplexity

Perplexity's search-optimized model. Built for real-time web search with cited answers.

Input$3.00/M
Output$15.00/M
Context128K tokens
Best ForResearch, fact-checking, current events analysis

Cost Comparison by Scenario

Estimated cost per project with 30% cache hit rate. Actual costs may vary based on usage patterns.

ScenarioClaude Opus 4Perplexity Sonar ProSavings
Small Script (1K lines) $3.08 $0.55 Perplexity Sonar Pro saves $2.52 (82%)
Medium Feature (10K lines) $23.29 $4.05 Perplexity Sonar Pro saves $19.24 (83%)
Large Project (50K lines) $116.44 $20.25 Perplexity Sonar Pro saves $96.19 (83%)
Code Review (5K lines) $6.02 $0.90 Perplexity Sonar Pro saves $5.12 (85%)

Verdict

Perplexity Sonar Pro wins on both price and performance — $3.00/M input with a benchmark score of N/A/100.

For most developers, this is the clear choice between these two models.

Compare with Other Models