Claude Opus 4 vs Mistral Medium
Performance benchmarks + pricing comparison — updated April 2026
Claude Opus 4
AnthropicAnthropic's most powerful model. Best for complex reasoning and challenging coding tasks.
| Input | $15.00/M |
| Output | $75.00/M |
| Context | 200K tokens |
| Best For | Complex architecture decisions, debugging hard bugs, research |
| Benchmark | 86/100 |
Mistral Medium
MistralMid-tier Mistral model between Small and Large. Strong coding capability at a moderate price point.
| Input | $0.400/M |
| Output | $2.00/M |
| Context | 128K tokens |
| Best For | Day-to-day coding, mid-complexity tasks, cost-performance balance |
Cost Comparison by Scenario
Estimated cost per project with 30% cache hit rate. Actual costs may vary based on usage patterns.
| Scenario | Claude Opus 4 | Mistral Medium | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small Script (1K lines) | $3.08 | $0.07 | Mistral Medium saves $3.00 (98%) |
| Medium Feature (10K lines) | $23.29 | $0.54 | Mistral Medium saves $22.75 (98%) |
| Large Project (50K lines) | $116.44 | $2.70 | Mistral Medium saves $113.74 (98%) |
| Code Review (5K lines) | $6.02 | $0.12 | Mistral Medium saves $5.90 (98%) |
Verdict
Mistral Medium wins on both price and performance — $0.400/M input with a benchmark score of N/A/100.
For most developers, this is the clear choice between these two models.
Compare with Other Models
Claude Sonnet 4
AnthropicAnthropic's balanced model for coding and general tasks. Best price-performance ratio in the Claude family.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
AnthropicPrevious generation Sonnet. Still excellent for coding tasks at the same price point.
Claude 3.5 Haiku
AnthropicFast, cost-effective model for high-volume tasks. Great for code review and simple queries.
Claude 3 Opus
AnthropicFirst generation Opus. Highest reasoning capability in the Claude 3 family.
Claude 3 Sonnet
AnthropicFirst generation Sonnet. Balanced performance for general tasks.
Claude 3 Haiku
AnthropicCheapest Claude model. Fast responses for simple tasks and basic coding.