Claude Opus 4 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite

Performance benchmarks + pricing comparison — updated April 2026

Claude Opus 4

Anthropic

Anthropic's most powerful model. Best for complex reasoning and challenging coding tasks.

Input$15.00/M
Output$75.00/M
Context200K tokens
Best ForComplex architecture decisions, debugging hard bugs, research
Benchmark86/100

Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite

Google

Google's most cost-effective Gemini model. Great for high-volume, latency-sensitive applications.

Input$0.075/M
Output$0.300/M
Context1M tokens
Best ForHigh-volume tasks, real-time applications, cost-sensitive projects

Cost Comparison by Scenario

Estimated cost per project with 30% cache hit rate. Actual costs may vary based on usage patterns.

ScenarioClaude Opus 4Gemini 2.0 Flash LiteSavings
Small Script (1K lines) $3.08 $0.01 Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite saves $3.07 (100%)
Medium Feature (10K lines) $23.29 $0.09 Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite saves $23.20 (100%)
Large Project (50K lines) $116.44 $0.43 Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite saves $116.01 (100%)
Code Review (5K lines) $6.02 $0.02 Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite saves $6.00 (100%)

Verdict

Gemini 2.0 Flash Lite wins on both price and performance — $0.075/M input with a benchmark score of N/A/100.

For most developers, this is the clear choice between these two models.

Compare with Other Models