Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Databricks Llama 3.1 405B

Performance benchmarks + pricing comparison — updated April 2026

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Anthropic

Previous generation Sonnet. Still excellent for coding tasks at the same price point.

Input$3.00/M
Output$15.00/M
Context200K tokens
Best ForCoding assistants, web development, data analysis
Benchmark72/100

Databricks Llama 3.1 405B

Databricks

Meta's 405B model hosted on Databricks. Largest open-weight model available for enterprise use.

Input$5.00/M
Output$15.00/M
Context128K tokens
Best ForEnterprise AI, complex reasoning, custom fine-tuning

Cost Comparison by Scenario

Estimated cost per project with 30% cache hit rate. Actual costs may vary based on usage patterns.

ScenarioClaude 3.5 SonnetDatabricks Llama 3.1 405BSavings
Small Script (1K lines) $0.62 $0.63 Claude 3.5 Sonnet saves <$0.01 (1%)
Medium Feature (10K lines) $4.66 $4.75 Claude 3.5 Sonnet saves $0.09 (2%)
Large Project (50K lines) $23.29 $23.75 Claude 3.5 Sonnet saves $0.46 (2%)
Code Review (5K lines) $1.20 $1.25 Claude 3.5 Sonnet saves $0.05 (4%)

Verdict

Claude 3.5 Sonnet wins on both price and performance — $3.00/M input with a benchmark score of N/A/100.

For most developers, this is the clear choice between these two models.

Compare with Other Models