Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Databricks DBRX Instruct

Performance benchmarks + pricing comparison — updated April 2026

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Anthropic

Previous generation Sonnet. Still excellent for coding tasks at the same price point.

Input$3.00/M
Output$15.00/M
Context200K tokens
Best ForCoding assistants, web development, data analysis
Benchmark72/100

Databricks DBRX Instruct

Databricks

Databricks' open MoE model. Competitive with GPT-3.5 for coding and general tasks.

Input$0.750/M
Output$2.25/M
Context32K tokens
Best ForCustom fine-tuning, coding assistance, enterprise NLP

Cost Comparison by Scenario

Estimated cost per project with 30% cache hit rate. Actual costs may vary based on usage patterns.

ScenarioClaude 3.5 SonnetDatabricks DBRX InstructSavings
Small Script (1K lines) $0.62 $0.09 Databricks DBRX Instruct saves $0.52 (85%)
Medium Feature (10K lines) $4.66 $0.71 Databricks DBRX Instruct saves $3.94 (85%)
Large Project (50K lines) $23.29 $3.56 Databricks DBRX Instruct saves $19.73 (85%)
Code Review (5K lines) $1.20 $0.19 Databricks DBRX Instruct saves $1.02 (84%)

Verdict

Databricks DBRX Instruct wins on both price and performance — $0.750/M input with a benchmark score of N/A/100.

For most developers, this is the clear choice between these two models.

Compare with Other Models