Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Perplexity Sonar Reasoning Pro

Performance benchmarks + pricing comparison — updated April 2026

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Anthropic

Fast, cost-effective model for high-volume tasks. Great for code review and simple queries.

Input$0.800/M
Output$4.00/M
Context200K tokens
Best ForCode review, high-volume tasks, simple queries
Benchmark52/100

Perplexity Sonar Reasoning Pro

Perplexity

Perplexity's most advanced search model with deep reasoning. Complex research tasks with cited sources.

Input$5.00/M
Output$20.00/M
Context128K tokens
Best ForDeep research, academic analysis, complex investigations

Cost Comparison by Scenario

Estimated cost per project with 30% cache hit rate. Actual costs may vary based on usage patterns.

ScenarioClaude 3.5 HaikuPerplexity Sonar Reasoning ProSavings
Small Script (1K lines) $0.16 $0.78 Claude 3.5 Haiku saves $0.61 (79%)
Medium Feature (10K lines) $1.24 $5.75 Claude 3.5 Haiku saves $4.51 (78%)
Large Project (50K lines) $6.21 $28.75 Claude 3.5 Haiku saves $22.54 (78%)
Code Review (5K lines) $0.32 $1.38 Claude 3.5 Haiku saves $1.05 (77%)

Verdict

Claude 3.5 Haiku wins on both price and performance — $0.800/M input with a benchmark score of N/A/100.

For most developers, this is the clear choice between these two models.

Compare with Other Models