Grok Code vs GPT-4.1
Side-by-side pricing and cost comparison for AI coding projects.
Grok Code
xAIxAI's coding-specialized model. Optimized for code generation, debugging, and software engineering tasks.
| Input | $1.50/M |
| Output | $7.50/M |
| Context | 128K tokens |
| Best For | Code generation, debugging, software development workflows |
GPT-4.1
OpenAIUpdated GPT-4 generation with improved instruction following and reduced hallucination. Better coding accuracy than GPT-4o.
| Input | $2.00/M |
| Output | $8.00/M |
| Context | 128K tokens |
| Best For | Production coding, API development, complex instructions |
Cost Comparison by Scenario
| Scenario | Grok Code | GPT-4.1 | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small Script (1K lines) | $0.28 | $0.31 | Grok Code saves $0.03 (10%) |
| Medium Feature (10K lines) | $2.02 | $2.30 | Grok Code saves $0.27 (12%) |
| Large Project (50K lines) | $10.13 | $11.50 | Grok Code saves $1.38 (12%) |
| Code Review (5K lines) | $0.45 | $0.55 | Grok Code saves $0.10 (18%) |
Verdict
Grok Code is cheaper at $1.50/M input vs $2.00/M for GPT-4.1.
For a typical medium feature project, Grok Code costs $2.02 compared to $2.30 for GPT-4.1.
However, GPT-4.1 may offer production coding, api development, complex instructions — choose based on your specific needs.
Compare with Other Models
Claude Sonnet 4
AnthropicAnthropic's balanced model for coding and general tasks. Best price-performance ratio in the Claude family.
Claude Opus 4
AnthropicAnthropic's most powerful model. Best for complex reasoning and challenging coding tasks.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
AnthropicPrevious generation Sonnet. Still excellent for coding tasks at the same price point.
Claude 3.5 Haiku
AnthropicFast, cost-effective model for high-volume tasks. Great for code review and simple queries.
Claude 3 Opus
AnthropicFirst generation Opus. Highest reasoning capability in the Claude 3 family.
Claude 3 Sonnet
AnthropicFirst generation Sonnet. Balanced performance for general tasks.